{Live Well} Walmart Just Got A Whole Lot Healthier

- Walmart Just Got A Whole Lot Healthier - 


Organic foods should be available to everyone, not just those at the top of the food chain, so to speak. That was the message Thursday when Walmart announced its new line of organic foods“We’re removing the premium associated with organic groceries,” said Jack L. Sinclair, executive vice president of Walmart U.S.’s grocery division. 
Starting this month, Walmart will begin offering 100 organic products from Wild Oats, a processed-organic-foods line, at prices at least 25% lower than anywhere else in the country. If these initial products sell well, Walmart says it will consider branching out to fresh options, such as meat and produce. And, the company has good reason to be hopeful: According to internal research, 91% of Walmart's customers say they would buy organic products if they were more affordable. 
Previously, of course, one of the biggest counterpoints to the organic movement was that high prices made organic options inaccessible to a large number of Americans. Places like Whole Foods have made a killing with the organic craze, without much competition from mainstream markets, who can't afford to lower their prices to compete. Not surprisingly, pundits see this move as a big blow to Whole Foods, envisioning a mass exodus of loyalists as customers realize they can get their organic on for less elsewhere. But, as has happened over and over again in the past, experts expect that driving down the prices on organic goods will have the biggest effect on small health-food stores, who will be forced to compete or be driven out of business

If this grand organic experiment succeeds, it could signal a huge change in the way Americans eat. Currently, Walmart sells 30% of the groceries in this country; they also make up 50% of its sales. If even a fraction of those sales were organic items, it would mean that more Americans have access to food raised without pesticides or hormones. And, at the end of the day, isn't that a good thing? (The New York Times



No comments:

Post a Comment